![Share on Facebook Facebook](https://i0.wp.com/www.petersalebooks.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/facebook.png?resize=48%2C48&ssl=1)
![Share on Twitter twitter](https://i0.wp.com/www.petersalebooks.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/twitter.png?resize=48%2C48&ssl=1)
![Share on Reddit reddit](https://i0.wp.com/www.petersalebooks.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/reddit.png?resize=48%2C48&ssl=1)
![Pin it with Pinterest pinterest](https://i0.wp.com/www.petersalebooks.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/pinterest.png?resize=48%2C48&ssl=1)
![Share on Linkedin linkedin](https://i0.wp.com/www.petersalebooks.com/wp-content/plugins/social-media-feather/synved-social/image/social/regular/96x96/linkedin.png?resize=48%2C48&ssl=1)
On 2nd December the Globe and Mail reported that “some 20 years after countries first identified the need for a treaty to limit man-made emissions of greenhouse gases, [the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is] still pursuing an agreement that would set the world on a path to achieving the called-for reductions”. A breakthrough came in Japan at COP3, with the Kyoto Accord, but the failure to ratify by the USA, and foot-dragging by others, notably Canada, have made it ineffective. Now “no one expects a broad new agreement that would supersede Kyoto to be concluded at Durban. It would be counted a victory if ministers can leave South Africa without the entire UN climate edifice collapsed in ruin”. What kind of a victory is this?
The blog is cool
Comments are closed.